Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
STIR
Search
Search
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
STIR FAQ
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Should I change the default projectors used by the reconstruction? == For STIR 2.x, the default for the iterative reconstructions was to use a ray tracing forward projector and an incremental interpolating backprojector. This turned out to be a bad choice as these projectors are not matched, which creates problems (even if the incremental backprojector does work on your system, see the known problems). It's probably best to use matched projectors, and the easiest way to do that is to use a "matrix". The fastest is the ray tracing matrix. This is the default projector since STIR 3.0. However, this is still not ideal as this defaults to using only 1 ray per bin in the sinogram. This can create discretisation artefacts in high count situations. For the iterative algorithms, you should therefore probably use something like this in your .par file: <pre> projector pair type:= Matrix Projector Pair Using Matrix Parameters:= Matrix type:= Ray Tracing Ray tracing matrix parameters:= number of rays in tangential direction to trace for each bin:= 10 End Ray tracing matrix parameters:= End Projector Pair Using Matrix Parameters:= </pre> For the analytic algorithms, using a ray tracer as backprojector can create (other) discretisation artefacts. You can alleviate this by using more rays, but in 3D, the ray tracing matrix doesn't take a Jacobian into account (as you don't have to for iterative reconstructions). Either stick to the default interpolating backprojector, or use its matrix equivalent. See the User's Guide.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to STIR may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
STIR:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Toggle limited content width